Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the good cause standard “requires the movant to show the ‘scheduling deadlines cannot be met despite [the movant’s] diligent efforts.’”
• holding that the “standard requires the movant to show the ‘scheduling deadlines cannot be met despite [the movant’s] diligent efforts.’”
• holding that “parties seeking to amend their complaints after a scheduling order deadline must establish good cause for doing so”
• holding that Rule 16(b)(4)’s good cause standard applies to requests to amend the pleadings after the scheduling order’s deadline has passed
• concluding that there was no need to address Rule 15(a) because the plaintiffs did not demonstrate good cause under Rule 16
• concluding that good cause standard requires movant to show that deadline cannot be met despite diligent efforts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).