Gormley v. magicJack VocalTec Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘We reject the contention that the State Plan was adopted without sufficient scientific research and investigation as required by N.J.S.A 13:1B-30. That simply is not so.”
• \It was clearly within the discretion of the [agency] . . . to determine which of various theories and approaches to adopt.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).