Skip to main content
· 7/1/1858

Gorman v. Sutton

Citations

  • 32 Pa. 247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “scienter is a necessary element in the proof of violation of” a predecessor to § 3745
  • indicating that a violation of a predecessor statute was established by driver’s knowledge that he damaged a lawn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Church

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.