Gorka v. Highland Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining “claims of fraud must be pled with particularity, which means proffering the who, what, when, where, and how of the fraud alleged”
• explaining “claims of fraud must be pled with particularity, which means proffering the who, what, when, where, and how of the fraud alleged”
• subjecting an unjust enrichment claim premised on a fraudulent promise to Rule 9(b)
• “Because [Plaintiffs’] claims of civil theft and unjust enrichment ‘sound in fraud,’ they are subject to Rule 9(b)’s requirements.”
• “Because [the plaintiffs’] claims of civil theft and unjust enrichment ‘sound in fraud,’ they are subject to Rule 9(b)’s requirements.” (quoting Wilding, 941 F.3d at 1127)
• in Westfall certification context, request for discovery cannot be based on allegations of complaint alone, and the plaintiff must forecast specific evidence that contradicts the Attorney General’s certification decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).