Gore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding because the postconviction court failed to address a claim and the attachments did not conclusively refute the defendant’s allegations
• reversing summarily denied postconviction claim and remanding for reconsideration where postconviction court failed to address portion of allegations and where the allegations were not refuted by the record
• “[B]ecause the trial court failed to address one portion of Gore’s third claim and the attached portions of the record do not conclusively refute the claim, we reverse the summary denial of that claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DeAngelo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-16· cited 1×
• Larry E. O'Steen v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-16· cited 1×
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-05· cited 1×
• ERALDO PEREZ PEREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-14
• Mejia v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-05-01

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Gutierrez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-05· cited 9×