· 9/10/2014
Gore v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 67 F. Supp. 3d 147
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126434
- 2014 WL 4443298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that there was not a fundamental change to the student's education program when he was moved from a school with an 11-month calendar to one with a 10-month calendar
- concluding that there was not a fundamental change to the student’s education program when he was moved from a school with an 11-month calendar to one with a 10-month calendar
- explaining that \the content of [the student's] IEP is the focal point of the inquiry into whether there has been a fundamental change in [the student's] education program\
- explaining that “the content of [the student’s] IEP is the focal point of the inquiry into whether there has been a fundamental change in [the student’s] education program”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.