Skip to main content

Gordon v. State

Citations

  • 406 S.E.2d 110
  • 199 Ga. App. 704
  • 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 987

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The jury was authorized to find that defendant’s spitting on the officer while refusing to identify himself was not merely discourteous, it actually hindered and obstructed [the] [o]fficer ... in the discharge of his official duties”
  • “The jury was authorized to find that defendant’s spitting on the officer while refusing to identify himself was not merely discourteous, it actually hindered and obstructed [the] [o]fficer... in the discharge of his official duties.”
  • “The jury was authorized to find that defendant’s spitting on the officer while refusing to identify himself was not merely discourteous, it actually hindered and obstructed [the] [o]fficer ... in the discharge of his official duties.”
  • the State was not required to prove that the defendant committed a crime in more than one manner where the indictment charged that the crime was committed in more than one way; proof that the crime was committed in one of the methods alleged was sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Birdsong, Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.