Gordon v. Munn
Citations
- 88 Kan. 72
- 127 P. 764
- 1912 Kan. LEXIS 17
Syllabus
<p>OPINION DENYING A REHEARING.</p> <p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Rehearing Denied—Statements in Opinion Modified. Criticisms of the opinion (87 Kan. 624, 125 Pac. 1) in this case are considered, and certain statements therein modified.</p> <p>2. Antenuptial Contract — Construction — Conveyance. The antenuptial contract considered in this action should be construed according to the intention of the parties to be gathered from the entire instrument,” the nature of the property to be conveyed, and the effect of the agreement in vesting the equitable title in the wife. So considered it is held that a conveyance by the husband was not indispensable to its enforcement in the circumstances disclosed by the evidence and findings.</p>
Judges: Benson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-07-06· cited 32×
- Hastings v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1810-10-15· cited 20×
- Rouse v. RouseSupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-07-05· cited 19×
- Slingerland v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1911-07-28· cited 19×
- Gibson v. GibsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1818-03-15· cited 17×
- Butman v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1868-11-15· cited 10×
- Bliss v. SheldonNew York Supreme Court· 1849-09-03· cited 9×
- Russell v. RussellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey· 1904-04-15· cited 5×
- Brenner v. GauchIllinois Supreme Court· 1877-06-15· cited 4×
- Sullings v. SullingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1864-10-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.