Skip to main content
· 4/15/1975

Gordon v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 533 P.2d 1194
  • 23 Ariz. App. 457
  • 1975 Ariz. App. LEXIS 584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[t]he purpose of a subpoena is to obtain the presence of a witness at the hearing,” adding that “[o]nce that witness is present, barring any sort of privilege, generally, either party may call him to testify”
  • explaining that “[t]he purpose of a subpoena is to obtain the presence of a witness at the hearing,” adding that “[o]nce that witness is present, barring any sort of privilege, generally, either party may call him to testify”
  • “[R]eversible error is more likely to occur by the exclusion of admissible evidence than the inclusion of incompetent evidence.”
  • courts will not presume that an administrative law judge reached the right result if he “erroneously excluded on technical grounds some important piece of evidence which might have swayed the result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wren, Nelson, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.