Skip to main content
· 10/15/1914

Gordon v. City of Hattiesburg

Citations

  • 108 Miss. 509
  • 66 So. 983

Syllabus

<p>Yagbanct. Common gambler. Evidence.</p> <p>In a trial for vagrancy, evidence that defendant had been convicted of gambling three or four times within two years next preceding the date of the indictment, is not sufficient to prove that he was a common gambler, there being nothing to show that he made a business of gambling or that he was á “person, who for the most part, maintained himself by gambling.”</p>

Judges: Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.