Gordon v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiffs who were not parties to the mortgage loans or assignments do not have standing to enforce the agreements
• “In light of the Second Circuit decision in Rajamin and the overwhelming body of case law in accord with that' ruling, the Court finds that Plaintiffs lack standing to assert a securities fraud claim as a non-party to the assignment agreements at issue.”
• “Plaintiffs . . . merely assert in a conclusory fashion that the copies of the documents sought to be recorded . . . were forgeries. Thus . . . Plaintiffs fail to state a [claim] for forgery, and [the court] grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).