Skip to main content
· 9/11/2000

Gordon v. Boyles

Citations

  • 9 P.3d 1106
  • 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5157
  • 28 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2409
  • 2000 Colo. LEXIS 1038
  • 2000 WL 1276748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The attorney-client privilege does not “encompass otherwise unprivileged facts disclosed in attorney-client relations, and unprivileged facts cannot become privileged merely by incorporation into a communication with an attorney.”
  • We hasten to add that attaching a non-privileged, non-confidential document to a communication with counsel does not render that document privileged or immunize it from proper discovery.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.