· 7/6/2009
Gordon v. Barnett
Citations
- 338 F. App'x 640
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting attempt by counsel to supplement the evidentiary record with documents, stating in part that even if considered the documents, their admission would not change the court’s finding
- bankruptcy court excluded expert opinion testimony before trial based on Daubert analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paez, Smith, Tallman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.