Skip to main content
· 3/16/2011

Gordon Document Products, Inc. v. Service Technologies, Inc.

Citations

  • 708 S.E.2d 48
  • 308 Ga. App. 445
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 838
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • words constituting slander per se “are those which are recognized as injurious on their face”
  • “Our analysis in this case is unaffected by any recent legislative proposals or changes. See O.C.G.A. § 13-8-2.1(a) and applicability date contained in Ga. L. 2009, p. 231, § 4.”
  • “Our analysis in this case is unaffected by any recent legislative proposals or changes.”
  • “the breach of fiduciary duty alleged here concerned [defendant’s] alleged solicitation of his co-workers ..., and there is no evidence he had the authority to bind the company on employment matters or relations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Smith, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.