Skip to main content
· 12/5/1989

Goral v. State

Citations

  • 553 So. 2d 1282
  • 1989 WL 146014

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that notice of only two working days was not a reasonable time for preparation of a defense
  • holding two working days notice was insufficient time to prepare a defense for contempt hearing
  • holding a motion for contempt or motion for order to show cause cannot itself serve as the order to show cause
  • holding two “actual working days notice” insufficient
  • two working days' notice of contempt hearing does not afford the defendant a reasonable time to prepare his defense
  • two working days notice of contempt hearing insufficient to afford defendant reasonable time to prepare defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, Nesbitt and Jorgenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.