· 12/5/1989
Goral v. State
Citations
- 553 So. 2d 1282
- 1989 WL 146014
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that notice of only two working days was not a reasonable time for preparation of a defense
- holding two working days notice was insufficient time to prepare a defense for contempt hearing
- holding a motion for contempt or motion for order to show cause cannot itself serve as the order to show cause
- holding two “actual working days notice” insufficient
- two working days' notice of contempt hearing does not afford the defendant a reasonable time to prepare his defense
- two working days notice of contempt hearing insufficient to afford defendant reasonable time to prepare defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hubbart, Nesbitt and Jorgenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.