Skip to main content
· 9/28/2006

Goplen v. 51Job, Inc.

Citations

  • 453 F. Supp. 2d 759
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70171
  • 2006 WL 2801881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting a plaintiff must explain “why the statement was fraudulent, rather than simply mistaken”
  • “But plaintiffs do not allege that the individual defendants actually sold any stock during the Class Period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haight

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.