Gootkind v. Family Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an attorney violated Rule 3.3 where she claimed she had not received email messages notifying her of a complaint but it could be reasonably inferred from the record that she received such messages
• stating that “to establish a violation of MARPC 8.4(b), Bar Counsel must prove two elements by clear and convincing evidence: (1) the attorney committed a criminal act; and (2
• stating that “to establish a violation of MARPC 8.4(b), Bar Counsel must prove two elements by clear and convincing evidence: (1) the attorney committed a criminal act; and (2
• finding an 8.4(c) violation where an attorney made knowingly and intentionally false statements to bar counsel
• limiting sanction for dishonest conduct to indefinite suspension because the attorney did not misappropriate funds
• finding an 8.4(c) violation where an attorney made knowingly and intentionally false statements to bar counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).