Goose Creek Consolidated v. Continental Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in Lee Way, the hazard insured against was the insured’s discrimination, so the insured’s uniform, system-wide discriminatory policy constituted a single occurrence
• defining a loss occurrence as \the total loss by perils insured against arising out of a single event\
• finding multiple occurrences because the “two fires [were] distinguishable in space and time” and “one did not cause the other”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).