Goosby v. Khoshdel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a dismissal on res judicata grounds is a “final judgment on the merits” (citation omitted)
• explaining that \[f]ederal law defines a 'cause of action' as 'a core of operative facts which give rise to a remedy[.]'\ (brackets in original)
• explaining that \[f]ederal law defines a 'cause of action' as 'a core of operative facts which give rise to a remedy[.]' \ (brackets in original)
• suggesting that a dismissal on res judicata grounds is a final judgment on the merits
• holding the plaintiff was not required to bring a contribution action under Section 113(f), rather than Section 107, for expenses it incurred under a consent decree that was not yet final
• explaining that \CERCLA prevents a covenant not to sue from taking effect until the President certifies that remedial action has been completed\; therefore, if such a condition served as a barrier to resolution of liability under section 113(f)(3)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).