District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/16/2007
Goolsby v. State
Citations
- 948 So. 2d 965
- 2007 WL 486487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the successor judge should have either summarily denied the motion, with supporting record attachments, or conducted a new evidentiary hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Judges of the District Court of Appeal, Fifth DistrictSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-11-05· cited 31×
- Goolsby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-10· cited 11×
- Zielke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-14· cited 2×
- Plucinik v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.