Goolsby v. Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the jury clearly disbelieved [the appellant’s] defense theories … and there exists no reason to disturb the jury’s determination on appeal”
• holding warrantless search of parolee’s residence permitted where parole agent had reasonable suspicion to suspect residence contained evidence of a crime or violation of condition of parole
• holding warrantless search of parolee’s residence permitted where parole agent had reasonable suspicion to believe residence contained 2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). -7- J-S22045-16 evidence of violations of parole conditions
• affirming 14 consecutive sentences for 14 videos of child pornography and finding merger doctrine inapplicable
• explaining “it is not this Court’s duty to become an advocate for an appellant and comb through the record to assure the absence of trial court error[]”
• explaining “it is not this Court’s duty to become an advocate for an appellant and comb through the record to assure the absence of trial court error[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).