Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co.
Citations
- 128 U.S. 598
- 9 S. Ct. 166
- 32 L. Ed. 535
- 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2258
Syllabus
<p>The name of “ Goodyear ¡Rubber Company,” containing a name descriptive of well-known elasses'of goods produced by the process known as Goodyear’s invention, is not one capable of exclusive appropriation; and the addition of the word “ Company ” only indicates that parties have f ormed an association to deal in such goods, either to produce or to sell them.</p> <p>Relief in equity to restrain unfair trade is granted only where the defendant, by. his marks, signs, labels, or in other ways, represents to the public . that the goods sold by him are those manufactured or produced by thé plaintiff, thus palming off his goods for those of a different'manufacture, , to the injury of the plaintiff.'</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the addition of the word \Company\ indicates only the business form of the entity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Field
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.