Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rios

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a jury verdict on a marketing defect claim where the plaintiff offered no expert testimony regarding the warnings that the defendant should have placed on the sidewall of a tire
• declining to permit inference of defect under Texas law based on circumstantial evidence of tire separation in middle of tire’s life where age and condition of tire defeated any weight carried by inference as proof of malfunction
• expert testimony required in defective marketing case to establish which warning and instruction should have been printed on tire sidewall
• expert testimony required in defective marketing case to establish which warning and instruction should have been printed on tire sidewall

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).