Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \We agree that it is not enough that the witness be qualified to propound opinions on a general subject; rather he must be qualified as an expert on the discrete subject on which he is asked to opine.\
• witness with general expertise on traffic devices unqualified to speak on speed bumps
• “We agree that it is not enough that the witness be qualified to propound opinions on a general subject; rather he must be qualified as an expert on the discrete subject on which he is asked to opine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).