Goodwin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• errors that could have been discovered through exercise of due diligence cannot form the basis of an extraordinary motion for new trial
• errors that could have been discovered through exercise of due diligence cannot form the basis of an extraordinary motion for new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Balkcom v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-07-15· cited 158×
• Terry Lee Goodwin v. Charles Balkcom, Warden
  Eleventh Circuit· 1982-09-03· cited 139×
• Depree v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-09-05· cited 36×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-11-25· cited 23×
• Goodwin v. Hopper
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-02-06· cited 20×
• Grant v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-06-19· cited 12×
• Gaddis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-02-06· cited 11×
• Hollmon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-02-04· cited 8×
• Bohannon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-03-13· cited 7×
• Blake v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-10-16· cited 6×
• Douthit v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-10-16· cited 5×
• Dix v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-10-16· cited 4×
• Jacob Weaver v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-06-30
• Hollman v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-02-04

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Goodwin v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-02-24· cited 76×
• Patterson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1971-11-18· cited 31×
• Bishop v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1968-01-15· cited 17×
• Barfield v. McEntyre
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1975-09-30· cited 4×