M.D. North Carolina· 10/29/1998
Goodwin Ex Rel. Goodwin v. Furr
Citations
- 25 F. Supp. 2d 713
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17591
- 1998 WL 774601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deputy sheriffs were ineligible to serve process in a case where the sheriff was a named party and it was alleged that he improperly exercised the duties of his office, because, as agents of the sheriff, they were interested parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eliason
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Efird v. RileyM.D. North Carolina· 2004-11-01· cited 47×
- United States v. JohnsonM.D. North Carolina· 2015-08-07· cited 5×
- Mabee v. Onslow County Sheriff's Dept.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-10-18· cited 4×
- Government Employees Retirement System v. Government of Virgin Islands Office of Attorney GeneralSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-05-12· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court· 1988-03-02· cited 3,553×
- Robinson v. Central Brass Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1993-10-04· cited 82×
- WCC Associates v. Hawaii Carpenters Trust FundsSupreme Court· 1997-06-27· cited 51×
- Dotson v. ChesterFourth Circuit· 1991-06-05· cited 48×
- Harter v. VernonM.D. North Carolina· 1996-03-22· cited 9×
- Braswell v. EllisE.D. North Carolina· 1995-07-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.