Goodson v. Castellanos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the duty to pay child support is not limited to the parent’s ability to pay from current earnings, and the court may consider all sources that might be used to pay child support”
• noting that trial court “may 6 consider all sources that might be used to pay child support” and concluding that court could have considered proceeds from sale of stock, deemed income from second home, or potential value from sale of that home in making child-support determination
• “Whether there was no evidence to support [the order] . . . would . . . be a relevant consideration in determining if the trial court abused its discretionary authority.”
• \Whether there was no evidence to support [the order] . . . would . . . be a relevant consideration in determining if the trial court abused its discretionary authority.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).