Goodroe v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a combination of factors such as residue not being tested, no evidence residue was a controlled substance, and lack of possession of illegal drugs upon arrest, was insufficient for satisfying the intent element
• finding that a combination of factors such as residue not being tested, no evi dence residue was a controlled substance, and lack of possession of illegal drugs upon arrest, was insufficient for satisfying the intent element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• M.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-03· cited 3×
• C.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-14· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Steele v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-07· cited 35×
• T.E.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-03· cited 5×
• Nixon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-23· cited 4×
• Waters v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-04· cited 1×