Goodrich v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that attorneys have great latitude in presenting closing arguments, provided that they adhere to the evidence presented to the jury, or logical inferences therefrom
• “The control of comments made to the jury by counsel is within the discretion of the trial court, and an appellate court will not interfere unless a party demonstrates an abuse of discretion.”
• “Attorneys should be given great latitude in presenting their closing arguments, but they are required to confine their argument to the facts and evidence presented to the jury, and all logical deductions therefrom.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Walker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-24· cited 18×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 7×
• LOT v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-22· cited 4×
• Hendrickson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 1×
• Jean v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-17· cited 1×
• Frett v. People
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2017-02-22· cited 1×
• Barnes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23
• Stepp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-06

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Herring v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,330×
• Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-08-17· cited 195×
• United States v. Daniel F. Kellington
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-07-07· cited 192×
• Occhicone v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-10-11· cited 87×
• Crump v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-06-10· cited 66×
• Peek v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-17· cited 66×
• Foster v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-07· cited 63×
• In re Carson
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 55×
• Raulerson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1958-04-23· cited 47×
• Torres v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 44×
• Hill v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-17· cited 41×
• Conde v. Henry
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-01-27· cited 39×
• Knoizen v. Bruegger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-10· cited 20×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-28· cited 14×