Goodrich v. Starrett
Citations
- 108 Wash. 437
- 184 P. 220
- 1919 Wash. LEXIS 872
Syllabus
<p>Nuisance (2)—What Constitutes Private Nuisance — Undertaking Establishment—Injunction. Under Rem. Code, §§ 943, 8309, defining nuisance, and adding to the common law definition a new element—“the comfortable enjoyment of one’s property”—an undertaking establishment and morgue, conducted in an old dwelling out of repair in the residential section of the city in such a manner as to affect the peace of mind and destroy the property values of the neighborhood will be enjoined as a nuisance.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court· 1928-12-17· cited 47×
- State v. PrimeauWashington Supreme Court· 1966-12-29· cited 39×
- Bragg v. IvesCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1927-12-22· cited 35×
- L. D. Pearson & Son v. BonnieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1925-02-27· cited 25×
- Meagher v. KesslerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1920-11-12· cited 25×
- City of St. Paul v. KesslerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1920-06-11· cited 24×
- Ferry v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1921-08-29· cited 23×
- Dawson v. LaufersweilerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1950-08-01· cited 21×
- Frederick v. Brown Funeral Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1952-11-10· cited 13×
- Brown v. ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-10-28· cited 7×
- Harford v. DagenhartOhio Court of Appeals· 1936-01-27· cited 2×
- Gibbs v. CookBaltimore City Circuit Court· 1928-06-08
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.