Goodrich v. Diodato

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ [although the defendant did not specifically refer to [General Statutes] § 47-21 in her special defense, the defendant sufficiently apprised the trial court of her special defense of ouster”
• defendant sufficiently apprised court of special defense of ouster even though statute not alleged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Colon v. Board of Education
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-10-03· cited 68×
• Spears v. Garcia
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-06· cited 38×
• Kramer v. Petisi
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-04-27· cited 33×
• Lord v. Mansfield
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-08-25· cited 29×
• Skakel v. Benedict
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-08-05· cited 20×
• 1525 Highland Associates, LLC v. Fohl
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-04-10· cited 19×
• Criscuolo v. Mauro Motors, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-04· cited 18×
• Mullen & Mahon, Inc. v. Mobilmed Support Services, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-02-27· cited 15×
• Hutchinson v. Town of Andover
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-08-11· cited 13×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rowe v. Godou
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-06· cited 465×
• Loewenberg v. Wallace
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-11-22· cited 63×
• Rowe v. Godou
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-11-03· cited 55×
• Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. Battistoni
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-03-17· cited 52×
• Whitney v. Turmel
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-03-18· cited 37×
• Oak Leaf Marina, Inc. v. Ertel
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-08-28· cited 26×
• F. & AK, INC. v. Sleeper
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-10-07· cited 17×
• Peters v. Pearl
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-03-07· cited 5×