Seventh Circuit· 10/31/2006

Goodman, Warren v. Bertrand, Daniel

Citations

467 F.3d 1022
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 26985
2006 WL 3071321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding failure to call “disinterested witness” who was “crucial aspect” of the case was ineffective
counsel’s failure to subpoena im‐ portant defense witness because he thought the state would, was prejudicial when combined with “catalog” of other er‐ rors
the testimony of witnesses who would corroborate the 24 State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. 25 State v. Neumann, 2013 WI 58, ¶141 n.87, 348 Wis. 2d 455, 832 N.W.2d 560; Domke, 337 Wis. 2d 268, ¶33 (citing Thiel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Ripple, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.