Goodman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because the “proscribed act took place” outside of Maryland, a Maryland court had no jurisdiction
• “The crime consists of two elements: the criminal intent and the act. Here, the criminal intent was formed in Maryland, but the proscribed act took place in Washington, D.C.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-15· cited 38×
• Pennington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-09· cited 36×
• Frasher v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-01-14· cited 33×
• Boddie v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-04-21· cited 26×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-04-07· cited 25×
• Trindle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-16· cited 21×
• Williamson v. District of Columbia Board of Dentistry
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-09-08· cited 11×
• State v. Deaner
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1985-06-03· cited 4×
• Douglass v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-07· cited 4×
• West v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-12-28· cited 2×
• United States v. Montgomery County
  D. Maryland· 1984-01-20· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Breeding v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-06-08· cited 99×
• Bowen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-10-01· cited 47×