Goodman-Gable-Gould Co. v. Tiara Condominium Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming exclusion under Rule 37 where party failed to disclose certain theories of recovery and damages in its answer, counterclaim, and initial interrogatory responses and failed to supplement its initial disclosures
• affirming the district court’s exclusion of evidence because statements made during a deposition and references to relevant expenses in a discovery supplement did not provide notice of the party’s theory of liability; those disclosures did not constitute a supplement at all

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).