Skip to main content
· 6/17/1994

Gooding v. Stotts

Citations

  • 856 F. Supp. 1504
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9195
  • 1994 WL 319675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If the proof is lacking, regardless of whether a case is tried to the court on stipulated facts or to a jury, on either stipulated facts or in a trial filled with in-court testimony, the result is the same—the defendant is found not guilty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saffels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.