Gooding Realty Corporation v. Bristol Bay Cvs, Inc. 99-4987 (2002)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the jury’s determination encompasses “‘whether the defendant’s belief in imminent danger was reasonable, whether the force used was reasonable, and whether the defendant was without fault’” (quoting State v. Renner, 912 S.W.2d 701, 704 (Tenn. 1995)
• “There is simply nothing in the text of our constitution nor in our history that supports the Miller Court’s holding that the meaning of ‘ex post facto’ in Tennessee is more expansive than the definition provided by Justice Chase in 1798.”
• “There is simply nothing in the text of our constitution nor in our history that supports the Miller Court’s holding that the meaning of ‘ex post facto’ in Tennessee is more expansive than the definition provided by Justice Chase in 1798.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).