Gooden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• great latitude should be allowed attorneys in cross-examining witnesses, but their questions should not contain insinuations that defendant is guilty of some other crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rammel
  Utah Supreme Court· 1986-06-27· cited 78×
• Brodbent v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-06-21· cited 10×
• Spees v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-03-27· cited 8×
• Parks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-11-23· cited 5×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-10-27· cited 3×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-11-27· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lovell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1969-05-14· cited 35×
• Samples v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1959-04-01· cited 34×
• O'BRIEN v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1975-08-27· cited 8×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1975-09-24· cited 7×