Gooden v. City of Atlanta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding operation of public swimming pool primarily for public benefit and not for revenue production was a governmental function
• finding operation of public swimming pool primarily for public benefit and not for revenue production was a governmental function
• operation of public recreational swimming facilities, primarily for public benefit rather than for revenue producing, is a governmental function, so that the city is shielded from negligence claims by doctrine of governmental immunity
• operation of public recreational swimming facilities, primarily for public benefit rather than for revenue producing, is a governmental function, so that the city is shielded from negligence claims by doctrine of governmental immunity
• operation of public recreational swimming facilities, primarily for public benefit rather than for revenue producing, is a governmental function, so that the City is shielded from negligence claims by the doctrine of governmental immunity
• operation of public recreational swimming facilities, primarily for public benefit rather than for revenue producing, is a governmental function, so that the City is shielded from negligence claims by the doctrine of governmental immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).