Goode v. City of Philadelphia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding taxpayers lacked standing to assert claims based upon generalized injury that all persons in Philadelphia suffered
• holding taxpayers lacked standing to assert claims based upon generalized injury that all persons in Philadelphia suffered
• dismissing taxpayers’ access-to-court claim because their alleged “injuries are no different in nature from the general interest in enforcing compliance with the law which the public shares”
• dismissing taxpayers’ right-to-petition claim because their alleged “injuries are no different in nature from the general interest in enforcing compliance with the law which the public shares”
• modifying district court’s order dismissing action for lack of standing so that dismissal was without prejudice
• modifying district court’s order dismissing action for lack of standing so that dismissal was without prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).