Goodcents Holdings, Inc. v. Watts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that policy terms written in bold type are defined terms
• noting that the practice of excluding coverage for vehicles which are 6 Appellate Case: 24-1358 Document: 46-1 Date Filed: 06/25/2025 Page: 7 not specifically insured under the policy is common, “legally sound,” and “supported by policy” (quotations omitted)
• a liability insurance policy exclusion for vehicles owned by or available for the regular use of the named insured but not listed in the policy is permissible
• “[C]ourts should read the provisions of the policy as a whole, rather than reading them in isolation. Courts may neither add provisions to extend coverage beyond that contracted for, nor delete them to limit coverage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).