Good v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even while the Plaintiff may not ultimately succeed on a 14 “delayed discovery” theory, the plaintiff need only show that success is possible
• explaining that fraudulent joinder exists when “there is no possibility that 3 the plaintiff will be able to establish a cause of action in State court against the alleged sham 4 defendant”
• explaining that fraudulent joinder exists when 17 “there is no possibility that the plaintiff will be able to establish a cause of action in State court 18 against the alleged sham defendant”
• Discussing motion to remand before motion to stay and finding stay proper after finding remand improper
• “Nothing in Witkin’s Summary [of California Law], however, or in Lippert itself, limits 15 the rule in the case to contractual claims.”
• “Courts frequently grant stays pending a 7 || decision by the MDL Panel regarding whether to transfer a case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).