Good Timez, Inc. v. Phoenix Fire and Marine Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing overly general itemization that contained “many entries in which two or more different kinds of legal work were lumped together”
• criticizing overly general itemization that contained “many entries in which two or more different kinds of legal work were lumped together”
• criticizing overly general itemization that contained \many entries in which two or more different kinds of legal work were lumped together\
• charges for photocopying and telephone calls have been \repeatedly held as not reimbursable under Section 541\
• charges for photocopying, telephone calls have been \repeatedly held as not reimbursable under Section 541\
• “In computing what is a reasonable award of attorney’s fees in a particular case, the court should consider, among other things, the novelty and complexity of the issues presented in that case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).