Gonzalez v. Rock Wool Engineering & Equipment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing the factors to be considered in determining the duty to warn issue, but declining to impose the duty given the facts
• affirming dismissal of amended complaint while noting, in part, that seller corporation “dissolved over a year” after the sale
• no duty to warn where successor did not service, maintain, or repair the machine involved in the accident
• “[I]n the absence of any evidence indicating a continuing relationship between Bemis and Forty-Eight Insulations, we find that there is no basis for the imposition of liability upon Bemis for breach of a duty to warn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).