Gonzalez v. McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when court of appeals determines evidence is factually insufficient, it must detail the evidence relevant to the issue and state in what regard the contrary evidence greatly outweighs the evidence in support of the verdict
• noting that \a memorandum opinion generally should focus on the basic reasons why the law applied to the facts leads to the court's decision.\
• observing that under Rule 47.4, appellate court cannot overrule factual sufficiency challenge to jury verdict without explaining why
• \[N]either the appellate rules nor this Court require detailed recitations of the evidence when a factual sufficiency complaint is overruled.\
• “[N]either the appellate rules nor this Court require detailed recitations of the evidence when a factual sufficiency complaint is overruled.”
• “[N]either the appellate rules nor this Court require detailed recitations of the evidence when a factual sufficiency complaint is overruled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).