Gonzalez v. Martel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because Ms. Johnson has not pointed to evidence in the record to show that she suffered actual damages that were caused by Defendants’ alleged [TDCA] violations, the undersigned concludes that no genuine dispute of material fact exists as to her damages.”
• not deciding the issue but noting, “we have doubts that an appeal of the final judgment allows a collateral attack on the propriety of a Rule 54(b) judgment from which an appeal was not taken. When dismissing untimely appeals of Rule 54(b
• “Johnson's appeal focuses on the federal claims that were dismissed in that Rule 54(b) judgment. That partial final judgment started its own clock for filing a notice of appeal. Because Johnson filed her notice more than thirty days after entry of the Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).