Gonzalez v. El Dia, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony parroting EEOC regulations on substantial limitations, without more, \would not enable a rational trier of fact to undertake the case-by-case assessment demanded under the ADA\
• holding that without admissible evidence to infer an age-based animus, summary judgment is appropriate
• finding that retirement offer was not the adverse employment action at issue; instead, a suspension without pay and a termination were the adverse actions
• noting that‘failure to identify the time and context of allegedly ageist remarks weighed against a finding that the adverse employment action was connected to the remarks
• finding that a comment was a stray remark, in part because the record did not identify the context or time of the remark
• noting that suspension constitutes an adverse employment action for ADEA purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).