Skip to main content
· 5/10/2007

Gonzalez v. DREW INDUSTRIES INC.

Citations

  • 750 F. Supp. 2d 1061
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35952
  • 2007 WL 7287245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a claim under the Song-Beverly Act requires that “the product 27 had a defect or noncomformity covered by the express warranty . . . .”
  • finding that notice was sufficient under the Song-Beverly Act where plaintiff provided notice to defendant on the same date of filing the original complaint, which was fifty days prior to adding the Song-Beverly Act claim to the first amended complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dean D. Pregerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.