Gonzalez-Corella v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district courts may impose conditions prohibiting possession of otherwise-legal pornography so long as the courts justify the condition under the statutory sentencing factors
• noting that courts have upheld special conditions restricting access to “pornography” or “sexually explicit materials” when a defendant has been convicted of possessing child pornography
• holding, in the context of reviewing a special condition of supervised release, that the First Amendment generally protects even the substantially broader “right to possess sexually explicit material involving adults”
• discussing how courts have upheld special conditions restricting access to pornography when a defendant was convicted of possessing child pornography
• examining whether the record justified the imposition - of special conditions in the absence of an adequate individualized assessment
• “When . . . neither the Sentencing Commission nor Congress has required or recommended a condition, we expect the sentencing court to provide a reasoned basis for applying the condition to the specific defendant before the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).