Gonzales v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the insurer was not entitled to bring its DTPA claim or recover punitive damages or attorney’s fees as a subrogee
• holding that where the underlying suit settled in excess of primary policy limits, \an excess carrier may bring an equitable subrogation action against the primary carrier\
• holding filing deadline in the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act, now chapter 21 of the labor code, is mandatory and jurisdictional
• holding filing deadline in the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act, now chapter 21 of the labor code, is mandatory and jurisdictional
• holding filing deadline in the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act, now chapter 21 of the labor code, is mandatory and jurisdictional
• holding filing deadline in the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act, now chapter 21 of the labor code, is mandatory and jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).