Gonzales v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This court has consistently held that hearsay evidence is admissible as proof of market value.”
• ―This court has consistently held that hearsay evidence is admissible as proof of market value.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gloria Sandone v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-01-17· cited 33×
• Hanna v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-02-09· cited 19×
• Kirkland v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-12-20· cited 13×
• Ortiz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1987-02-18· cited 9×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-05-12· cited 9×
• Alexander v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-06-18· cited 2×
• Pichon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-07-07· cited 2×
• Darren James Rush v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2023-03-09

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Esparza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-05-22· cited 26×
• Morris v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-05-29· cited 15×
• Lucas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-04-08· cited 14×
• Hermosillo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-12-07· cited 7×
• Collier v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-11-09· cited 6×
• Murphy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1955-02-09· cited 3×